Brilliance Nonetheless

W ALWAYS has the best magazine covers, often outrageous but brilliant nonetheless. And then there's always the controversial Kim Kardashian cover.

THE MAG does the most beautiful shoots...except for Tilda Swinton. Now that girl isn't exactly pretty and they've just made her look worse in her weird, weird cover piece. I'm not exaggerating, they made her look like a man.

BUT AS for Julia Roberts, January Jones and Mila Kunis they retained their absolute beauty. I already have a girl crush on Mila, and in the article she just seems like a great person to know.

I JUST love checking out what they've done lately, it's so inspiring. Now if only I could get the magazine in SA...for a decent price.

W is for Whatever

KIM KARDASHIAN has once again gone nude in front of a camera. This time for W Magazine and she was promised it would be a "tasteful" shoot.


BUT AFTER seeing these clear nipple shots, Kim was left raging as she was told she would be covered in the body paint and nothing would be seen. I know there is quite of bit of nudity in W's photoshoots but I thought she would have learnt by now to stop with the nudity. I don't particularly think the full body shots were necessary, the cover and the shot below it look great though. To see the article, click here.

DO YOU think it was necessary for Kim to be fully naked?